March 7, 2017

Ontology (Central Problems of Philosophy) by Dale Jacquette

By Dale Jacquette

The philosophical examine of what exists and what it capability for anything to exist is among the middle matters of metaphysics. This creation to ontology presents readers with a entire account of the crucial principles of the topic of being. This booklet is split into components. the 1st half explores questions of natural philosophical ontology: what's intended through the concept that of being, why there exists whatever instead of not anything, and why there's just one logically contingent genuine international. Dale Jacquette indicates how good judgment presents the single attainable solutions to those basic difficulties. the second one a part of the ebook examines problems with utilized medical ontology. Jacquette bargains a severe survey of a few of the main influential conventional ontologies, resembling the excellence among visual appeal and fact, and the kinds of substance and transcendence. The ontology of actual entities - area, time, subject and causation - is tested in addition to the ontology of summary entities corresponding to units, numbers, houses, kinfolk and propositions. The designated difficulties posed by way of the subjectivity of brain and of postulating a god also are explored intimately. the ultimate bankruptcy examines the ontology of tradition, language and artwork.

Show description

Read or Download Ontology (Central Problems of Philosophy) PDF

Best logic & language books

Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language

This volumes target is to supply an advent to Carnaps booklet from a old and philosophical viewpoint, each one bankruptcy targeting one particular factor. The ebook could be of curiosity not just to Carnap students yet to all these drawn to the historical past of analytical philosophy.

Inference from Signs: Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence

Unique and penetrating, this booklet investigates of the concept of inference from indicators, which performed a principal position in historic philosophical and clinical procedure. It examines an immense bankruptcy in historic epistemology: the debates in regards to the nature of facts and of the inferences in response to it--or symptoms and sign-inferences as they have been referred to as in antiquity.

Ontology (Central Problems of Philosophy)

The philosophical examine of what exists and what it capability for anything to exist is without doubt one of the center issues of metaphysics. This advent to ontology presents readers with a finished account of the relevant rules of the topic of being. This booklet is split into components. the 1st half explores questions of natural philosophical ontology: what's intended via the concept that of being, why there exists anything instead of not anything, and why there's just one logically contingent genuine global.

Counterfactuals and Probability

This quantity explores counterfactual suggestion and language. we will be able to mostly review counterfactual questions probabilistically, predicting what will be most probably or not likely to occur. Schulz describes those probabilistic methods of comparing counterfactual questions and turns the knowledge right into a novel account of the workings of counterfactual proposal.

Additional info for Ontology (Central Problems of Philosophy)

Example text

The trouble, if trouble there is, lies entirely in the theory, in the metaphysics of being, with how we try to answer the question of the meaning of being. If we want to avoid circularity in this context, then we should not accept any propositions that presuppose a concept or proposition to which we are not entitled until we have drawn further conclusions lower down in the chain. If in the end it appears that we cannot avoid circularity, then we must acknowledge and try to live with it, as Heidegger does.

It is the sense in which we say that the number  exists or does not exist, that oxygen exists but phlogiston does not exist, that God exists or does not exist. The predication sense of “being” is equally familiar, but is not always adequately distinguished from the existence sense. We use the predication sense of “being” in grammatically explicit ways when we say for example that  has the property of being an irrational real number, or simply that  is an irrational real number. We can equally say in the same family of expressions for the existence sense of being that  simply is (or is not), or in attributing any property to any object, including, as we have seen, the predication of the property of being in the existence sense, as when we say that  has the property of being existent, and even of the being of an object’s being.

The proposed a priori methodology, based in logic rather than phenomenology, the answer to Heidegger’s fundamental question of being, and the applied scientific ontology that results, despite these similarities, will be radically non-Heideggerean. Aprioristic phenomenology An insuperable philosophical difficulty arises for Heidegger’s method. How is a phenomenology validated only by a particular conscious animal’s experience of being in the world, granted all its salient intentionalities and time horizons of action, attitudes towards things around it and the like, supposed to be a priori?

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.04 of 5 – based on 13 votes